Which Board Members Voted Yes to Drugging NRHA Horses

With the statement regarding the NRHA that is new drug revisions, we have been hard at work with people hitting the telephones to find out how board members allegedly voted in “SediGate”. The provision to inject horses with a sedative 30 minutes prior to an event during warm-up times.

In the letter that is open all people, NRHA President Rick Clark, suggested it needed a supermajority of 67% vote to pass through the newest medication guidelines and charges; consequently needing 12 votes minimal. The president can just only vote in a tie-breaker, so he could be omitted. Men and women can just only vote once.

Clark Goes on to write

“Like the industry, the board was split between the social people who wanted the policy and those that were against it. We did not have the support to go to a no allowance for Romifidine (Sedivet) at this time. We were faced with some unfortunate but very likely scenarios we needed to enact some changes.”

• The if we did not get the support Method it presumably moved:
• 18 ballots from the Board of administrators and Executive Committee:

4 voted – No to Sedivet – 22%

14 voted – indeed to Sedivet – 78%

Each individual can just only vote as soon as, no matter if on both the board and committee that is executive

Individual member votes are shown below.

If a member of the Board of Directors or Executive Committee believes their vote is incorrectly reported, we invite the individual that is particular compose to us and advise their particular vote, and we’ll straight away upgrade the information and knowledge.

These Indeed voters will be the social people who, as stated by Rick Clark, did not want any changes to the rules and agreed only if Sedivet was included as an approved drug.